Independent patient information. No advertising, no sponsorship, nothing sold.

Aquaprurigo Self-check

The project

Why this site exists

Aquaprurigo began as one person's problem and one frustration: a condition that affects daily life for decades, and almost no patient data anywhere to describe it.

Reviewed 31 July 20262 min read

The symptoms started at around age seven and carried on into adult life. Cold water was the main trigger — showers, the sea, swimming pools, rain — and so were heatwaves and sweating. The most violent episodes did become less frequent over the years, but the condition never stopped being part of an ordinary day.

Two things helped, discovered the way most people discover them: by trial and error, with nobody to ask. Starting with a very hot shower before switching to colder water. Drying completely and quickly, with heat or microfibre. Neither is a treatment, and neither came from a doctor.

Plenty did not help. Moisturisers. Antihistamines. Baking soda baths — which is worth recording honestly, because the published literature describes sodium bicarbonate baths as effective in classic primary aquagenic pruritus. One person's experience is not evidence, in either direction. That gap between an individual account and useful data is the entire reason this site exists.

For a condition that affects up to one in five young adults in some surveyed populations, there is remarkably little describing what living with it is actually like.

What the project is trying to do

There are no ads on this site, no sponsors, no affiliate links, and nothing is sold. It is not a company. How the content is written and sourced.

What would actually help

Contributing a testimony. That is genuinely the bottleneck — the self-check takes about two minutes and ends with the option to add your experience, which arrives with the structured answers already attached. If you would rather just write, the form takes two fields.

Add your experience

Aquagenic pruritus has almost no comparable patient data — which is exactly why it gets dismissed. Two fields is all this needs.

Only used to reply to you or ask a follow-up question. Never published, never sold, and there is no mailing list.

Add clinical detailOptional — makes the record far more useful